Ron Elam, 4w5
It is my intention to elaborate on an issue which has profound implications for the future of enneagram study, the ongoing debate re: science vs. amateurism (see “Subjective vs. Objective: Searching for Common Ground” in the Oct. 1995 issue of the Enneagram Monthly). I wish to address John Fudjack’s “The Pitfalls of Professionalism: Science, Art, and the Enneagram” (EM: Nov., 1995). In his article, Fudjack criticizes “professionalism,” charging the “professional” scientist with a ...
Subscribe today (returning users login) to access more of this article as well as the entire Enneagram Monthly archive.
