ISix months after the Enneagram Monthly began publication, an interesting debate appeared in its pages between Ken Huffman and Robert Frager: “Subjective vs. Objective: Searching for Common Ground.”1
Each author presented arguments about how we should approach our study of the enneagram. Huffman focused on the importance of intuition, creativity, and intersubjective sharing of ideas while Frager pointed out the benefits of research and testing, as well as the limits of human intui...
Subscribe today (returning users login) to access more of this article as well as the entire Enneagram Monthly archive.
